We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES AG

Download Mobile App




Test Results of Fingerstick Blood Vary Significantly

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 29 Nov 2015
Blood obtained via fingerstick is commonly used in point-of-care assays, but few studies have assessed variability in parameters obtained from successive drops of fingerstick blood, which may cause problems for clinical decision making and for assessing accuracy of point-of-care tests.

The most accurate way to carry out medial laboratory tests is to draw blood from a vein and send it to a laboratory but sometimes, such as in low-resource settings, results are needed more rapidly, or the health professional is not trained to draw vein-blood, or there is no laboratory. More...
In such settings, there is a higher reliance on fingerstick tests.

Bioengineers at Rice University (Houston, TX, USA) used a hematology analyzer to analyze the hemoglobin concentration, total white blood cell (WBC) count, three-part WBC differential, and platelet count in six successive 20 µL of blood collected from one fingerstick from each of 11 donors. The team used a hemoglobinometer to measure the hemoglobin concentration of 10 drops of fingerstick blood from each of seven donors to check whether the minimum droplet size made a difference and they checked all the results against blood taken from donors' veins. They also followed best practice to ensure accurate results. For example, they wiped away the first droplet to remove traces of disinfectant, and they did not squeeze or "milk" the finger.

The results showed that hemoglobin content, platelet count and white blood cell count varied significantly from drop to drop. The average percent coefficient of variation (CV) for successive drops of fingerstick blood was higher by up to 3.4 times for hemoglobin, 5.7 times for WBC count, three times for lymphocyte count, 7.7 times for granulocyte count, and four times for platelets than in venous controls measured using a hematology analyzer. The average percent CV for fingerstick blood was up to five times higher for hemoglobin than venous blood measured using a point-of-care hemoglobinometer. The investigators found that averaging the results of six to nine successive droplet tests produced results on a par with the venous blood tests.

Meaghan M. Bond, a doctoral student and first author of the study, said, “In some donors, the hemoglobin concentration changed by more than 2 g/dL in the span of two successive drops of blood. Our results show that people need to take care to administer fingerstick tests in a way that produces accurate results because accuracy in these tests is increasingly important for diagnosing conditions like anemia, infections and sickle-cell anemia, malaria, HIV and other diseases.” The study was published on November 18, 2015, in the American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Related Links:

Rice University



Gold Member
Fibrinolysis Assay
HemosIL Fibrinolysis Assay Panel
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
HBV DNA Test
GENERIC HBV VIRAL LOAD VER 2.0
Sample Transportation System
Tempus1800 Necto
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: LiDia-SEQ aims to deliver near-patient NGS testing capabilities to hospitals, labs and clinics (Photo courtesy of DNAe)

World's First NGS-Based Diagnostic Platform Fully Automates Sample-To-Result Process Within Single Device

Rapid point-of-need diagnostics are of critical need, especially in the areas of infectious disease and cancer testing and monitoring. Now, a direct-from-specimen platform that performs genomic analysis... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: The AI tool advances precision diagnostics by linking genetic mutations directly to disease types (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

AI Tool Simultaneously Identifies Genetic Mutations and Disease Type

Interpreting genetic test results remains a major challenge in modern medicine, particularly for rare and complex diseases. While existing tools can indicate whether a genetic mutation is harmful, they... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.