We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
LGC Clinical Diagnostics

Download Mobile App





Scientific Session Explores Future Role of AI and ML in Clinical Laboratory

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 26 Jul 2023
Print article
Image: AI and machine learning are expected to play a significant role in clinical laboratories (Photo courtesy of Freepik)
Image: AI and machine learning are expected to play a significant role in clinical laboratories (Photo courtesy of Freepik)

The enthusiasm surrounding the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in laboratory medicine is unprecedented. This makes it crucial for laboratory professionals to acquire fundamental knowledge of these systems as they are set to become an integral part of clinical practice. At the AACC 2023 scientific session, “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Clinical Laboratories: Fundamental Concepts, Clinical Use Cases, and Future Considerations,” attendees learned about the role that AI and ML can play in the clinical laboratory.

Considering the enormous amount of data produced by laboratories, the potential for implementing AI algorithms across all stages of the testing procedure is immense. Nonetheless, to truly harness the power of these algorithms, it's essential to understand and appreciate the functioning of such models. In the first part of the session, Christopher Williams, MD, from the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (Oklahoma City, OK, USA) taught attendees some of the foundational concepts of AI and ML. Williams introduced various types of ML, a subset of AI that includes supervised and unsupervised learning. Williams laid out an understanding of the core concepts that can empower laboratorians to begin questioning why a model makes certain decisions—a skill that can prove useful for those evaluating their own models as well as for those approached by vendors with AI-enabled products.

In the second part of the session, David McClintock, MD, from Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) discussed the tools and skills required by laboratory professionals to integrate AI/ML applications in clinical laboratories. This does not mean that laboratorians will have to become coding experts. According to McClintock, there are simple “low-code and no-code” test systems that can aid non-experts in generating AI/ML models. However, he cautioned that it is still vital to think about datasets critically from the laboratory perspective.

“This is where it is more important not to understand the coding but to understand what the model is looking for,” said McClintock. A laboratorian should be able to answer basic questions when developing and using a model such as: “What am I looking for? How do I structure my data? What are the inputs? What are the outputs?”

McClintock also described some of the obstacles hampering the wider distribution of AI/ML. “We don’t expect one group to figure all this out,” he said. Collaboration is key, and McClintock believes it is important for more people with backgrounds in data science to be brought into the laboratory in order to ensure the right support is in place from both the lab side as well as the IT side.

AI holds the power to transform laboratory medicine, although several questions remain unanswered. “There is a time and place for AI, and we’re going to learn what that is,” said McClintock. Laboratorians must be ready and begin understanding where and how AI/ML can fit in. But McClintock made it clear that “AI and ML are coming to your laboratory.”

Thomas Durant, MD, from Yale School of Medicine (Wallingford, CT, USA) discussed various key issues related to the implementation of AI/ML applications, including ethics, interoperability, and regulatory considerations. Patient safety is a key concern for Durant who emphasized that lab professionals must perform their due diligence before integrating AI tools as there can be biases within a model that could cause potential harm.

“We need to collectively as a field develop some degree of technology literacy around these new applications,” said Durant. From there, an acceptable framework can be developed for validating and verifying the performance of these tools.

Related Links:
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Mayo Clinic
Yale School of Medicine

New
Gold Member
Antipsychotic TDM Assays
Saladax Antipsychotic Assays
New
Gold Member
LEISHMANIA Test
LEISHMANIA ELISA
New
Rheumatoid Arthritis Test
Finecare RF Rapid Quantitative Test
New
Treponema Pallidum Test
ZEUS IFA Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody-Absorption (FTA-ABS) Test System

Print article

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: Umbilical cord blood biomarkers may improve preterm infant care (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

Umbilical Cord Blood Test Could Identify Preterm Infants at Risk for Medical Complications

Advancements in medical technology and neonatology have significantly improved the care of prematurely born infants. However, these infants still face heightened risks for medical complications, such as... Read more

Immunology

view channel

3D Bioprinted Gastric Cancer Model Uses Patient-Derived Tissue Fragments to Predict Drug Response

Tumor heterogeneity presents a major obstacle in the development and treatment of cancer therapies, as patients' responses to the same drug can differ, and the timing of treatment significantly influences prognosis. Consequently, technologies that predict the effectiveness of anticancer treatments are essential in minimizing... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The Cytovale System isolates, images, and analyzes cells (Photo courtesy of Cytovale)

Rapid Sepsis Diagnostic Test Demonstrates Improved Patient Care and Cost Savings in Hospital Application

Sepsis is the leading cause of death and the most expensive condition treated in U.S. hospitals. The risk of death from sepsis increases by up to 8% for each hour that treatment is delayed, making early... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.