We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
LGC Clinical Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




cfDNA Testing Reduces Pregnancy Risks

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 08 Nov 2024
Print article
Image: The new study demonstrates the value of targeting the right patients when deploying precision medicine (Photo courtesy of 123RF)
Image: The new study demonstrates the value of targeting the right patients when deploying precision medicine (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

The highly anticipated emergence of "precision medicine" promises customized technologies that can benefit individuals while potentially lowering healthcare costs. Now, new research suggests that pregnancy screening can achieve both of these goals, but it also underscores the need for precision medicine to be appropriately matched with patients to realize cost savings. The study focused on cfDNA screenings, a blood test capable of identifying conditions linked to chromosomal variations, such as Down Syndrome. For many, but not all, pregnant women, cfDNA screenings serve as a non-invasive alternative to amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS), which carries a risk of miscarriage. The researchers found that the greatest benefit from cfDNA testing is observed in patients deemed at moderate risk, rather than those classified as extremely high risk.

To conduct the study, the collaborative research team that included investigators from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA) analyzed the implementation of cfDNA screening in Sweden between 2011 and 2019, utilizing data from over 230,000 pregnancies. The study revealed regional variations in the extent to which cfDNA screenings were covered by Swedish healthcare for patients not already scheduled for invasive testing. Some regions widely covered cfDNA testing for all patients with assessed "moderate" risk or higher, while others limited coverage to specific patients within that risk group. This variation provided a valuable context for the researchers’ analysis. In areas with extensive coverage, 86% of patients underwent the procedure, whereas in regions with more selective coverage, only about 33% did. In both cases, the rate of invasive testing, including amniocentesis, significantly decreased to around 5%.

While cfDNA screenings provide valuable information, they are not entirely conclusive, leading some pregnant women to opt for follow-up invasive procedures. Both methods, however, resulted in comparable reductions in invasive testing rates. Nonetheless, the cost implications differ considerably. The study estimates that widespread implementation of cfDNA testing would increase overall medical expenses by approximately USD 250 per pregnancy, while targeted coverage could lead to a cost reduction of about USD 89 per patient. This highlights a crucial aspect: pregnant women at the highest risk of having children with chromosome-related conditions are still likely to choose invasive tests like amniocentesis, whereas those with virtually no risk may forgo cfDNA testing altogether. For those in the middle risk category, cfDNA testing offers significant medical benefits, reducing the need for invasive procedures, and targeting this group can help lower overall costs.

Moreover, the study emphasizes a broader issue: precision medicine, in any form, tends to increase medical expenses. Thus, it is essential to develop clarity regarding who should receive such interventions. Instead of merely applying technology indiscriminately, a more strategic approach is needed, guided by evidence. This suggests that effective precision medicine should be rooted in sound policy analysis, not solely in technological advancement. In this context, identifying patient groups that will benefit most from cfDNA screenings offers a method for refining diagnostic practices. Across various medical scenarios, pinpointing the subset of individuals who are most likely to derive actionable insights from new technologies appears to be a promising goal.

“People who are very high-risk are often going to use the invasive test, which is definitive, regardless of whether they have a cfDNA screen or not,” said Amy Finkelstein, an MIT economist and co-author of the paper detailing the study published in the Journal of Political Economy. “But for middle-risk people, covering cfDNA produces a big increase in cfDNA testing, and that produces a big decline in the rates of the riskier, and more expensive, invasive test.”

New
Gold Member
ANA & ENA Screening Assays
ANA and ENA Assays
Gold Member
Flocked Fiber Swabs
Puritan® Patented HydraFlock®
New
hCG Urine Test
QuickVue hCG Urine Test
New
Borrelia Burgdorferi Test
AESKULISA Borrelia-M

Print article

Channels

Hematology

view channel
Image: The new test could improve specialist transplant and transfusion practice as well as blood banking (Photo courtesy of NHS Blood and Transplant)

New Test Assesses Oxygen Delivering Ability of Red Blood Cells by Measuring Their Shape

The release of oxygen by red blood cells is a critical process for oxygenating the body's tissues, including organs and muscles, particularly in individuals receiving large blood transfusions.... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Concept for the device. Memory B cells able to bind influenza virus remain stuck to channels despite shear forces (Photo courtesy of Steven George/UC Davis)

Microfluidic Chip-Based Device to Measure Viral Immunity

Each winter, a new variant of influenza emerges, posing a challenge for immunity. People who have previously been infected or vaccinated against the flu may have some level of protection, but how well... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The iFAST reader scans 5000 individual bacteria with each sample analyzed in less than a minute (Photo courtesy of iFAST)

High-Throughput AST System Uses Microchip Technology to Rapidly Analyze Bacterial Samples

Bacteria are becoming increasingly resistant to antibiotics, with resistance levels ranging from 20% to 98%, and these levels are unpredictable. Currently, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) takes... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Human tear film protein sampling methods (Photo courtesy of Clinical Proteomics. 2024 Mar 13;21:23. doi: 10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8)

New Lens Method Analyzes Tears for Early Disease Detection

Bodily fluids, including tears and saliva, carry proteins that are released from different parts of the body. The presence of specific proteins in these biofluids can be a sign of health issues.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.