We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
PURITAN MEDICAL

Download Mobile App




Events

09 Apr 2024 - 12 Apr 2024
15 Apr 2024 - 17 Apr 2024
23 Apr 2024 - 26 Apr 2024

Biomarker Tests Benefit Certain Cancer Patients

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 17 Sep 2018
Print article
Image: The Oncotype DX analyzes 21 genes in the tumor to estimate a woman\'s risk of the cancer coming back after surgery (Photo courtesy of Genomic Health).
Image: The Oncotype DX analyzes 21 genes in the tumor to estimate a woman\'s risk of the cancer coming back after surgery (Photo courtesy of Genomic Health).
The benefit of biomarker tests has been reinvestigated to support the decision for or against adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in certain breast cancer patients, that is, women with primary hormone receptor-positive, HER2/neu-negative breast cancer and 0 to 3 affected lymph nodes.

The available biomarker tests aim to assess whether a woman would develop recurrences if she omitted chemotherapy in addition to hormonal therapy, i.e. if her breast cancer would return. Each test analyses the expression of a different group of genes. It is therefore possible that some tests are better at predicting the risk of recurrence than a clinician, who looks at factors such as tumor size and type of tumor tissue, whereas other tests are not.

Scientists at the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWIG, Köln, Germany) investigated the TAILORx study which questioned whether, in women with intermediate Oncotype (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, USA) risk score (11 to 25), recurrences were notably more frequent without additional chemotherapy than with chemotherapy.

For all participants overall, there were no statistically significant differences. The women’s age apparently made a difference, however: For patients over 50 years of age or after menopause, the number of recurrences was about the same with and without chemotherapy; hence this group benefited from a test-based decision against chemotherapy. In participants under 50 years of age or before menopause, in contrast, chemotherapy had significant advantages.

Women with risk scores below 11 and above 25 were not randomized in the study. Instead, participants with low scores were not to receive chemotherapy, whereas participants with high-risk scores were to receive this kind of treatment. However, plausible assumptions can be made on the basis of further study data and analyses of subgroups with the values of 11 to 15, 16 to 20, and 21 to 25. According to these assumptions, older women with risk scores between 0 and 25, and younger women with risk scores between 0 and 10 without affected lymph nodes can omit chemotherapy without notably increasing their risk of recurrence. Naturally, women for whom the decision for or against chemotherapy is already clear based on other factors are exempt from this recommendation.

Stefan Lange, MD, PhD, deputy director of the IQWIG, said, “A comparison with the other studies reveals two things. First, the disease event rates of about 15% to 17% were substantially higher than in the MINDACT study, for example. This means that notably more women had recurrences. In principle, this could be expected as the observation period of up to nine years was longer than in the study data available so far. We had noted in the final report that it is rather common for breast cancer to return only after many years, which is why five-year data are unsuitable for reliable conclusions. However, it is still remarkable that chemotherapy did not reduce the risk of recurrence at all in older study participants.”

Related Links:
German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
Oncotype

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Specimen Collection & Transport
Complement 3 (C3) Test
GPP-100 C3 Kit
New
Gold Member
TORCH Panel Rapid Test
Rapid TORCH Panel Test

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: MOF materials efficiently enrich cfDNA and cfRNA in blood through simple operational process (Photo courtesy of Science China Press)

Blood Circulating Nucleic Acid Enrichment Technique Enables Non-Invasive Liver Cancer Diagnosis

The ability to diagnose diseases early can significantly enhance the effectiveness of clinical treatments and improve survival rates. One promising approach for non-invasive early diagnosis is the use... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The low-cost portable device rapidly identifies chemotherapy patients at risk of sepsis (Photo courtesy of 52North Health)

POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Neutropenia, a decrease in neutrophils (a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infections), is a frequent side effect of certain cancer treatments. This condition elevates the risk of infections,... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.